Chapter 5 - Statutory Minimum Factors (2024)

Under INA 212(a)(4), officers are required to consider specific minimum factors in determining whether an applicant seeking admission to the United States or seeking to adjust status to that of lawful permanent resident is likely at any time to become a public charge. These statutory minimum factors include the noncitizen’s:

  • Age;

  • Health;

  • Family status;

  • Assets, resources, and financial status; and

  • Education and skills.[1]

This chapter discusses the statutory minimum factors. Subsequent chapters discuss the Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA and consideration of current or past receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance or long-term institutionalization at government expense.[2]

A. Age

USCIS must consider a noncitizen’s age in a public charge inadmissibility determination.[3] The applicant indicates their age on the Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (Form I-485).

In some circ*mstances, such as in the case of children, an applicant’s age may on its face suggest that they are at present unable to earn a living through employment. USCIS considers the applicant’s household’s income, assets, and liabilities, however, not just those of the applicant.

USCIS considers an applicant’s age in the totality of the noncitizen’s circ*mstances, as part of a prospective determination.[4] Furthermore, USCIS considers age in combination with the other factors, and examines the applicant’s age in relation to its possible impact on the other factors (for example, health or assets, resources, and financial status).

B. Health

USCIS must consider a noncitizen’s health in a public charge inadmissibility determination.[5]

1. Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record

In considering a noncitizen’s health in a public charge inadmissibility determination, USCIS generally defers to the medical information provided by a civil surgeon on the Report of Immigration Medical Examination and Vaccination Record (Form I-693) or by a panel physician on the following Department of State forms: Medical Examination for Immigrant or Refugee Applicant (1991 TB Technical Instructions) (Form DS-2053), the Medical Examination for Immigrant or Refugee Applicant (2007 TB Technical Instructions) (Form DS-2054), or the Electronic Medical Examination for Visa Applicant (DS-7794), and related worksheets.[6] Officers should not make health diagnoses.

Such information includes diagnoses of any Class A[7] or Class B medical conditions diagnosed by the civil surgeon or panel physician. Class A conditions are medical conditions listed inINA 212(a)(1)(A) that render a person inadmissible and ineligible for a visa or adjustment of status.

Class B medical conditions include any “physical or mental abnormality, disease, or disability serious in degree or permanent in nature amounting to a substantial departure from normal well-being,” in which case the civil surgeon or panel physician must also document “the nature and extent of the abnormality; the degree to which the alien is incapable of normal physical activity; and the extent to which the condition is remediable . . . [as well as] the likelihood, that because of the condition, the applicant will require extensive medical care or institutionalization.”[8]

USCIS may request additional information regarding an applicant’s health if the information provided in the report of medical examination is incomplete.[9]

2. Relationship Between Health and Disability

INA 212(a)(4)(B)(i) requires USCIS to consider a noncitizen’s health when making a public charge inadmissibility determination, which may include consideration of any disabilities, as defined by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, identified in the report of medical examination.[10] However, USCIS will not find an applicant inadmissible on the public charge ground solely based on an applicant’s disability.

As noted previously, no one factor (other than the lack of a sufficient Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA when required) will lead to a public charge inadmissibility finding. Disability alone is not a sufficient basis to determine whether a noncitizen is likely at any time to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence and therefore inadmissible under INA 212(a)(4).[11]

Additionally, many disabilities do not impact a person’s health, prevent a person from working, or require extensive medical care or institutionalization. In fact, the vast majority of people with disabilities do not use institutional care.[12]

Therefore, USCIS does not presume that a noncitizen having a disability in and of itself means that the noncitizen is in poor health or is likely at any time to become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence. Likewise, USCIS does not presume that the noncitizen’s disability in and of itself negatively impacts any of the other statutory minimum factors.

C. Family Status

USCIS must consider a noncitizen’s family status, as evidenced by the applicant’s household size, as household is defined in 8 CFR 212.21(f), in a public charge inadmissibility determination.[13]

The applicant indicates their household size on Form I-485. A household includes:[14]

  • The noncitizen;

  • The noncitizen’s spouse, if physically residing with the noncitizen;

  • The noncitizen’s parents, if physically residing with the noncitizen;

  • The noncitizen’s unmarried siblings under 21 years of age, if physically residing with the noncitizen;

  • The noncitizen’s children,[15] if physically residing with the noncitizen;

  • Any other individuals who are listed as dependents on the noncitizen’s federal income tax return;[16] and

  • Any other individuals who list the noncitizen as a dependent on their federal income tax return.

As seen in this list, an applicant’s household includes certain individuals living with the noncitizen (who may or may not contribute financially to the household) as well as certain relatives and close relations who may contribute financially to the noncitizen’s household while not residing with the noncitizen. Financial contributions from these non-cohabitating household members are included in the consideration of the applicant’s assets, resources, and financial status factor, as described below.

D. Assets, Resources, and Financial Status

USCIS must consider a noncitizen’s assets, resources, and financial status in a public charge inadmissibility determination.[17] In considering a noncitizen’s assets, resources, and financial status, USCIS examines the noncitizen’s household’s[18] income, assets, and liabilities.[19]

The applicant indicates their household’s income, assets, and liabilities on Form I-485. Noncitizens are not required to submit any specific supporting evidence related to their household’s income, assets, and liabilities. USCIS may request additional evidence on a case-by-case basis if more information is needed to make a public charge inadmissibility determination.

Income

Applicants indicate their household’s annual income, which may include income provided to the household from sources who are not members of the household, such as alimony or child support.[20] A household’s annual income excludes any income from Supplemental Security Income (SSI); Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); or state, tribal, territorial, or local cash benefit programs for income maintenance (often called “General Assistance” in the state context, but which also exist under other names).[21] Similarly, the household’s income excludes any income from illegal activities or sources such as proceeds from illegal gambling or drug sales.[22]

USCIS does not limit the consideration of income only to income that appears on federal income tax forms, and considers all evidence of income from lawful sources. Examples of income that may not appear on income tax forms include child support and alimony. Some households may also have regular income, such as Social Security income, that does not reach the minimum required threshold for filing federal income taxes.[23] USCIS also considers any evidence a noncitizen submits pertaining to expected future income.

In some instances, the household’s income may include income that has resulted from unauthorized employment. Whether a noncitizen or a member of the noncitizen’s household engaged in unlawful employment, and any immigration consequences flowing from such unauthorized employment, is a separate determination from the public charge inadmissibility determination.[24]

Therefore, this income is not excluded from the household’s income calculation, and USCIS considers any income derived from employment, regardless of whether the household members had employment authorization, as long as the income is not derived from illegal activities or sources, such as illegal gambling.

Assets and Liabilities

When considering the applicant’s financial status, USCIS also considers the noncitizen’s household’s assets and resources, for example, investments or home equity, excluding any assets from illegal activities or sources, such as proceeds from illegal gambling or drug sales. USCIS also considers the noncitizen’s household’s liabilities, both secured and unsecured, such as loans, alimony, and child support payments. By taking into account a noncitizen’s household’s liabilities, USCIS is able to examine the noncitizen’s overall financial status in the totality of the circ*mstances.

USCIS considers financial obligations and debts alongside assets and resources to avoid artificially inflating the calculation of a noncitizen’s financial status, as these obligations and debts would decrease the resources that are actually accessible to the noncitizen. However, if a noncitizen has financial obligations and debts, this does not necessarily indicate that the noncitizen is inadmissible under the public charge ground, and USCIS considers this factor in the totality of the circ*mstances.

E. Education and Skills

USCIS must consider a noncitizen’s education and skills in a public charge inadmissibility determination.[25] In considering a noncitizen’s education and skills in this determination, USCIS considers any degrees, certifications, licenses, educational certificates, and skills obtained through work experience or educational programs.[26] The applicant indicates their education and skills on Form I-485.

Skills obtained through work experience (including volunteer and unpaid opportunities) include but are not limited to the noncitizen’s workforce skills, training, licenses for specific occupations or professions, language skills, and certificates documenting mastery or apprenticeships in skilled trades or professions. Educational certificates are issued by an educational institution (or a training provider) and certify that an occupation specific program of study was completed.

While some noncitizens may establish their education and skills through evidence of completed degrees, the statutory education and skills factor does not specify that only formal education is acceptable.

USCIS may consider other evidence of attained knowledge and skills, including those skills earned through certifications and licensure, as well as skills obtained through on-the-job training or overall work experience. This consideration allows USCIS to acknowledge those noncitizens who hold occupations that do not require official licenses or certifications but whose occupations impart skills that otherwise affect the noncitizen’s overall employability.

Footnotes

[^ 1] See INA 212(a)(4)(B)(i).

[^ 2] See Chapter 6, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA [8 USCIS-PM G.6]. See Chapter 7, Consideration of Current and/or Past Receipt of Public Cash Assistance for Income Maintenance or Long-term Institutionalization at Government Expense [8 USCIS-PM G.7].

[^ 3] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(i).

[^ 4] For more information about the totality of the circ*mstances determination, see Chapter 4, Prospective Determination Based on the Totality of the Circ*mstances [8 USCIS-PM G.4]. For more information about the totality of circ*mstances specifically relating to children, see Chapter 9, Adjudicating Public Charge Inadmissibility for Adjustment of Status Applications, Section A, Evidence in the Record, Subsection 3, Other Notable Circ*mstances Relevant in the Totality of the Circ*mstances [8 USCIS-PM G.9(A)(3)].

[^ 5] See INA 212(a)(4)(B)(i).

[^ 6] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(ii). As of October 1, 2013, panel physicians only use DS-2054 or DS-7794. The DS-2053 is no longer used after that date. Applicants for adjustment of status generally submit Form I-693; however, immigrants applying for adjustment of status as a refugee, a derivative of an asylee, or a K or V nonimmigrant visa holder, as well as some Afghan nationals as part of Operation Allies Welcome who have already had a medical examination overseas, may submit a medical examination performed by a panel physician.

[^ 7] See42 CFR 34.2(d).

[^ 8] See 42 CFR 34.4(b)(2) and 42 CFR 34.4(c)(2). For more information about Class A and Class B conditions, see Volume 8, Admissibility, Part B, Health-Related Grounds of Inadmissibility [8 USCIS-PM B].

[^ 9] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(ii).

[^ 10] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(ii).

[^ 11] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(4).

[^ 12] See 87 FR 55472, 55544 (PDF) (Sept. 9, 2022).

[^ 13] See INA 212(a)(4)(B)(i). See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(iii).

[^ 14] See 8 CFR 212.21(f).

[^ 15] As defined in INA 101(b)(1).

[^ 16] Including a spouse or child as defined in INA 101(b)(1) not physically residing with the noncitizen.

[^ 17] See INA 212(a)(4)(B)(i).

[^ 18] As defined in 8 CFR 212.21(f).

[^ 19] USCIS does not include income derived from the public benefits listed in 8 CFR 212.21(b): Supplemental Security Income (SSI); cash assistance for income maintenance under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF); and state, tribal, territorial, or local cash benefit programs for income maintenance, commonly called “General Assistance,” in the income calculation. See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(iv). USCIS also does not include any income or assets derived from illegal activities or sources, such as proceeds from illegal gambling or drug sales. See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(iv).

[^ 20] See 87 FR 55472, 55475 (PDF) (Sept. 9, 2022).

[^ 21] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(iv).

[^ 22] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(iv) and 8 CFR 212.21(b).

[^ 23] See the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) Who Should File a Tax Return webpage for more information on the minimum taxable income threshold.

[^ 24] See INA 245(c)(2) and INA 245(c)(8). For more information about the unauthorized employment determination, see Volume 7, Adjustment of Status, Part B, 245(a) Adjustment, Chapter 6, Unauthorized Employment (INA 245(c)(2) and INA 245(c)(8)) [7 USCIS-PM B.6].

[^ 25] See INA 212(a)(4)(B)(i).

[^ 26] See 8 CFR 212.22(a)(1)(v).

Chapter 5 - Statutory Minimum Factors (2024)

FAQs

What is a zero point offender? ›

A: The Zero-Point Sentence Reduction is an effort to help certain individuals accused of federal crimes avoid time in prison if their crime is low-level and nonviolent. For those individuals who qualify, their offense may be lowered by two levels, which would allow them to avoid prison time.

How to calculate federal criminal history points? ›

The criminal history points are calculated by adding 3 points for each prior sentence of imprisonment exceeding one year and one month; adding 2 points for each prior sentence of imprisonment of at least sixty days but not more than 13 months; adding 1 point for each prior sentence of less than sixty days; adding 2 ...

How many states have sentencing guidelines? ›

The Federal Government and 16 States have implemented presumptive or voluntary/advisory sentencing guidelines. Each of these States has estab- lished guidelines for different purposes, and most of them were asked to meet multiple goals, including punishment, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabili- tation.

What is a guideline sentence? ›

Sentencing guidelines are a set of standards that are generally put in place to establish rational and consistent sentencing practices within a particular jurisdiction.

Who qualifies for 2 point reduction for federal inmates? ›

2-point reduction for federal inmates in 2024

A zero-point offender needs to meet some additional criteria in order to qualify for the two-level reduction. The offense for which they were convicted must not be: A sexual offense. A terrorism-related offense, or.

What is the least serious felony? ›

Convictions of these crimes carry some of the highest punishments. In contrast, a Class D felony, while still classified as a felony (meaning the punishment has to be at least one year in jail or prison and perhaps a small fine), is the least serious and is considered minor compared to other classes of crimes.

What percentage of a federal sentence must be served? ›

In federal court you will have to serve 85% of your sentence if convicted of federal charges. Thus, if you are sentenced to 10 years in prison, you will actually serve 8.5 years in prison. However, for most state felony convictions, you will only serve 50% of your actual sentence.

What are the two main factors considered under the federal sentencing guidelines? ›

  • he sentencing guidelines take into account both the seriousness of the offense and the offender's criminal history. ...
  • Adjustments. ...
  • (in months of imprisonment) ...
  • After the guideline range is determined, if an atypical aggravating or mitigating circ*mstance exists, the court may “depart” from the guideline range.

How do you calculate good time? ›

Here's an example: a prisoner is serving a term of imprisonment of five years (1,826 days, including an extra day for a leap year). His conduct is excellent and he earns all possible good time. He should serve 85% of each year sentenced: He should earn 54 days of good time as he completes each set of 311 days.

What state has the most lenient sentencing? ›

Nevertheless, Kentucky and New Jersey tied for the longest average sentence at 1.9 years, while South Dakota, New Mexico, and Wyoming were the most lenient, with an average of 0.3 years. For crimes against persons, states were generally much harsher in sentencing.

What states still have truth in sentencing? ›

The states that still have truth in sentencing include Illinois, Tennessee, Arizona, North Carolina, Missouri, Michigan, Connecticut, Mississippi, Oregon, Virginia, New York, and California.

What state has the most repeat offenders? ›

The recidivism rates in Alaska are 62.6%, the highest in the United States.

What factors does a judge consider when sentencing? ›

To decide the sentence, the judge considers the facts in the case, the sentencing guidelines, and other sentencing laws. If either side wants, they can argue what sentence a judge should give at a sentencing hearing.

How can I reduce my federal sentence? ›

Upon a motion by the government that the defendant has provided substantial assistance in the investigation or prosecution of another person who has committed an offense, the court may then reduce the sentence, including below a mandatory minimum sentence.

What is a statutory maximum sentence? ›

The punishment includes a statutory maximum (the highest amount of punishment a person can receive) and sometimes includes a mandatory minimum (the lowest amount of punishment a person must receive). In other words, mandatory minimums create a floor, and statutory maximums create a ceiling for punishment.

What is the lowest level offense? ›

Infractions, which can also be called violations, are the least serious crimes and include minor offenses such as jaywalking and motor vehicle offenses that result in a simple traffic ticket.

What is a zero-point offender 4C1 1? ›

First, the Commission created an “Adjustment for Certain Zero-Point Offenders,” now operative at Guideline § 4C1. 1. Under this section, if a defendant satisfies ten specifically enumerated criteria (detailed further below), she is entitled to a two-level reduction in her total-offense level.

What is the lowest felony in Texas? ›

State jail felonies are the least severe type of felony in Texas. Jail sentences can be as low as 180 days – around half of a year. They can be as high as 2 years. Fines can still go up to $10,000.

What are low level offenders? ›

If you're wondering, “What are low-level drug offenders?” the simplest answer is someone who has committed a minor, non-violent offense, such as possessing a small amount of a controlled substance that has minimal risk of abuse and commonly accepted medical uses.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Arielle Torp

Last Updated:

Views: 5347

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Arielle Torp

Birthday: 1997-09-20

Address: 87313 Erdman Vista, North Dustinborough, WA 37563

Phone: +97216742823598

Job: Central Technology Officer

Hobby: Taekwondo, Macrame, Foreign language learning, Kite flying, Cooking, Skiing, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Arielle Torp, I am a comfortable, kind, zealous, lovely, jolly, colorful, adventurous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.